more on this theme | more from this thinker | more from this text
Full Idea
My (counterfactual) analysis is meant to apply to causation in particular cases; it is not an analysis of causal generalizations. Those presumably quantify over particulars, but it is hard to match natural language to the quantifiers.
Gist of Idea
My counterfactual analysis applies to particular cases, not generalisations
Source
David Lewis (Causation [1973], p.195)
Book Ref
'Causation', ed/tr. Sosa,E. /Tooley,M. [OUP 1993], p.195
A Reaction
What authority could you have for asserting a counterfactual claim, if you only had one observation? Isn't the counterfactual claim the hallmark of a generalisation? For one case, 'if not-c, then not-e' is just a speculation.